![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jantz
From what I know, PSA initially graded T206 cards and catagorized them by name & pose(variation) only. Then just recently, PSA began listing T206s by their backs also. This may have been a result from multiple customer requests, but I can't confirm that. As far as PSA decreasing the amount of unknowns, I don't see how they could since they never recorded this information from the start. PSA also recently started putting the back distinctions on the slab label. Keep in mind Tim that these population reports, both PSA & SGC, aren't exact. The pop report numbers are a little off because of collectors/dealers cracking slabs & resubmitting cards for various reasons. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC/PSA Population Reports | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-22-2009 07:30 AM |
PSA, SGC and GAI population reports.....what gives? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-12-2007 06:34 AM |
psa population reports for t206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 07-04-2006 12:01 PM |
Population Reports | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-17-2005 02:07 PM |
sgc population reports | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-19-2005 05:47 PM |