![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave S
Most CJ collectors opt for the '15's simply because it is considered more of a "complete" set due to the fact that there are 176 vs. 144 cards. Secondly, the '14 Matty is a much tougher, costlier catch. And lastly, those after the mid/upper grade collection know that due to the extreme thinness and fragility of the 1914 paper stock, the odds of completing the '14 set is quite difficult. Not nearly as many printed, not nearly as many have survived. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1914 Cracker Jacks available | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-11-2008 04:39 PM |
FS: 1914 Cracker Jacks | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 08-05-2006 03:46 PM |
1914 Cracker Jacks | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-01-2005 04:32 PM |
1914 Cracker Jacks But What Else?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-01-2004 03:51 AM |
What do you think about these 1914 Cracker Jacks? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-18-2002 09:59 PM |