![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
IF I understand correctly then, ideally, the "Power Ranking" takes into account the player on the card, as well as the difficulty of the card, which really means that it corresponds to the value of the card, which has those things built in. That being the case, why would you invent a new metric which requires entering manual information for every card in every set - quite an impending task? Why not just use a price guide, or something like VCP which has that already? Plus, it would allow a much more precise "Power Ranking" as opposed to a vague 1 through 10 system. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help Ranking M101 4/5 backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-11-2009 06:23 AM |
T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
OT : College Football Ranking-- Just an Observation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 01-11-2009 05:53 AM |
T206's...the harder to get cards ranking? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-10-2007 11:19 AM |
Ranking Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-08-2006 09:22 AM |