![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
That's some good data....I like that your sample has 5 specimens in each category because I think there are cards that sell for more, or less, in a given grade, due to their own characteristics....while they have the same grade by a third party...Also there are cards that will sell for more than their technnical grade...This Matty presents almost as nice as the Clarke and is several grades lower due to a surface wrinkle. I think it would sell for more than a 3 if it were in auction (the Clarke could be a half grade high but I don't really care). It's all about supply and demand........regards |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E106 comparison and dilemma | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-24-2008 12:53 AM |
Common statistical comparison | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-01-2007 11:13 PM |
T206 Old Mill--Brown & Black Comparison | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 07-05-2007 11:47 PM |
Arod/10,000 Kelly Comparison | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-27-2006 06:59 PM |
2 - N167's comparison | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-21-2005 06:31 PM |