 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
10-11-2007, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
joe jackson famous & barr on ebay
Posted By: davidcycle
If he lied about the presence of said back back damage to get an expensive card, that would be fraud. If he was correct about said back damaged being present but did not divulge it at sale, that would be fraud. Assuming your facts are accurate, as he does not mention the back damage in his sales description and the picture he uses does not show said damage, he would have a difficult time in small claims court arguing that there ever was said back damage, and, if you had good records of the correspondence, you would likely win back the Goudey or financial compensation. In this scenario, his sales description would be your evidence, and the only way he could refute this evidence would be to show that his sales description was fraudulent. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| M101-4/5 Famous & Barr sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 10-18-2008 07:46 PM |
| 1916 M101-5 Famous & Barr "Shoeless" Joe Jackson SGC 30 | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 10-15-2007 10:06 AM |
| Famous & Barr cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 05-03-2007 07:21 AM |
| Help with Famous and Barr Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-24-2006 02:17 PM |
| Famous & Barr Co. Q? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-13-2004 10:37 PM |
Threaded Mode