![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
Pop is a factor in almost every grade. It is exaggerated at the very high-end, but why do you think SLs cost 3x what regular commons do? It is not a preponderance of nostalgic southerners compared with collectors from other parts of the country. It's the pop. Ted has done some great research in discerning which cards are tougher by series, etc. That research has revealed what collectors were already saying with their pocketbooks - that some commons are a lot tougher than others (i.e. low pops). |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T209 Hoffman SGC 10 BIG PRICE DROP and some raw T206s | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 02-11-2009 06:36 AM |
Should Registration Factor Into the Grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-17-2007 12:30 PM |
SOLD! lower price 4 t206s including Willis | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 08-03-2006 11:37 AM |
Why isn't Rarity the No.1 factor in determining a card's value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-06-2006 06:59 PM |
the ex-cub factor as predictor of outcome | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-21-2004 03:34 PM |