 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-10-2007, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate.
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Chad and Jeff, you hit the nail on the head. Beyond the determination as to whether or not a minor league card or a card not nationally distributed can be viewed as a first card, the question on what is simply a 'card' remains. As an example, the Cobb 'first card' debate: while I have all the postcards and cards that are generally thought of as possible 'rookie' cards (so I have no financial horse in this race), I believe a card is a card is a card and a postcard is a postcard, period. As for exhibits -- which were intended to be depictions of the player and not created to be mailed, I believe that they should count as 'cards.' Just my two cents on the issue of 'what is a card.' 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
| Marquard & Bush "Rookie" Cards . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-24-2008 10:49 AM |
| What is considered to be "Lefty" Groves rookie card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-20-2007 05:19 AM |
| Last night's "debate" .....some interesting observations. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 04-25-2004 06:52 PM |
| Speaking of Harry Hooper, what is his "rookie?" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-25-2002 01:35 PM |
Hybrid Mode
