![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil Garry
I agree with Barry that almost all serious collecctors are concerned #1 with the player image when it comes to OJ's and similar issues and are less concerned with the technical points that the grading companies focus their numerical grades on. I think the only way to change this is for the collectors who submit these cards for grading on a regular basis to continuously keep bringing it to the attention of the grading companies. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading blank backed cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-06-2008 03:38 PM |
WTB E97 blank back cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-03-2007 10:45 PM |
T204 Back Type Cards, RAMLY, TTT, BLANK | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 01-26-2007 09:48 AM |
14 B&W Blank Back Photo Baseball Cards, 3.25 x 5.25 inches | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-15-2005 04:33 PM |
Grading vintage cards with back damage | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-04-2004 07:03 PM |