 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
07-08-2007, 09:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Would someone explain to me why one of these cards has a qualifier and the other does not?
Posted By: Glyn PARSON
PSA has stated That Eye Appeal can allow them to loosen their stated standards of centering. Something doesnt look right with the top of the Speaker in my opinion though scans can be and often are deceiving. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cards with a "mk" qualifier (owner's stamp) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-21-2009 02:05 PM |
| PSA OC for Lower Grade without Qualifier? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 08-02-2008 10:06 AM |
| MC Qualifier on rare card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 08-21-2007 04:38 PM |
| PSA qualifier & pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-20-2002 01:38 AM |
| How did they miss the PD qualifier on this one? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-25-2002 05:16 PM |
Threaded Mode