![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rhett Yeakley
This is coming from someone eho has handled hundreds of cards from this series, I was simply stating that there are more blank back M101-5's out there than Famous and Barr's. Therefore, it is logical to believe that there would be more Thorpe's with the blank reverse. I am not disputing the fact that Mastro's write up is in error, I just found it kinda funny that Jay would bash them about a mistake and make a comment that isn't necessarily correct in the same sentence. I'm not sticking up for Mastro's error, they should know better than to get the M101-5's and M101-4's mixed up. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E270 Thorpe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 10-10-2007 06:54 PM |
Jim Thorpe? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-11-2006 04:14 AM |
Colgan Jackson and Thorpe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-17-2005 11:32 AM |
Jim Thorpe M101-5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-01-2004 05:27 AM |
Jim Thorpe | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-13-2002 11:00 AM |