 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
05-04-2007, 03:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
T205 Matty - why relatively high pop
Posted By: Dylan
I am one of those who agree that these are ugly cards, relative to most sets. I do like the Minor League issue and have collected them, because I think they present well. But the portraits in the main set are too close up for my taste. I like the chest up portraits that you see with all the other sets from the era. As for pricing for a long time, as i understand, T205 commons held a slight premium over T206. I'd imagine for the common card the'll stay relatively priced around the same. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Pop/ High Grade Commons | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-04-2009 06:21 PM |
| FS: T205 Matty (BVG 1) and T205 Duffy (GAI 4) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 08-04-2008 08:49 PM |
| T206 low pop high grade | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-14-2006 10:11 AM |
| High-grade T206 Joss, Matty, Chase (Sov.), Cobb (Orange) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-04-2006 03:38 PM |
| Looking for T205 Matty, Graded | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-20-2005 10:18 PM |
Threaded Mode