![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave S
There is no doubt that PSA is more lenient with E145 stains than SGC. I have crossed MANY from PSA to SGC and on stained cards, either held the same grade or dropped. Never bettered! If you're looking for the highest grade for re-sale and not to retain in your collection, you'll do better with PSA. Griffith's stains don't appear too significant unless the reverse is more pronounced. Left edge looks a hair irregular, might get docked for that but I'd guess your PSA 5 seems possible, think SGC would be 40-50...Good Luck.. HIPPO V was formerly a PSA5 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: A couple of CJ's | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 10-29-2008 02:11 PM |
2 1915 CJ's SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-24-2008 02:51 PM |
Show me your tape-stained cards ... | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 09-26-2007 09:32 PM |
Baseball Stained Glass | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-16-2004 09:44 PM |
Grades of Stained Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-26-2003 01:44 PM |