 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
04-16-2007, 10:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Memory Lane Redux?
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
My point was (1) that the "second" Grove (if it's the same card) has a cert. number within a group of 59 Topps FB which seems odd, and (2) that collectively, the "second" group of Goudeys (if they are the same cards) don't have consecutive numbers as you would expect if they were submitted all together by someone who won them and was cracking them out and resubmitting them, but appear to be numbered all over the place. Sorry if I wasn't clear. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Memory Lane | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-14-2009 03:09 PM |
| Memory Lane is Up | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 04-23-2008 09:48 AM |
| Mastro or Memory Lane | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 93 | 02-27-2008 08:15 AM |
| Speaking of Memory Lane | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-23-2007 11:43 PM |
| Opinions on Memory Lane Inc | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-01-2005 04:10 PM |
Threaded Mode