![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Leon is correct about how paper and ink are tested. If this were made recently, there would be chemicals found in the ink not known in 1930. If both the ink and paper were consistent with what was in use ca. 1930, then it is likely to be original. It's not hard to do, but it could be a bit expensive. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1932 Babe Ruth Sanella Authenticity? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 02-01-2009 05:23 PM |
N4: QUESTIONABLE AUTHENTICITY | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-04-2008 06:30 PM |
The 1930 ruth goudey calendar makes another appearance!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 08-24-2008 11:58 PM |
Hopeful conclusion to the 1930 Goudey Ruth saga...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 103 | 03-28-2007 02:19 PM |
Goudey Babe Ruth??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-20-2003 06:48 AM |