 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
03-02-2007, 05:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I am not a PSA basher...but?
Posted By: peter ullman
dave...the card is pretty obviously trimmed...to me. I've compared it to other...unaltered e106's I have and it's dramatically smaller...lengthwise and widthwise...as was the donovan I sold which probably now resides in a psa 5 holder and is the finest graded to date. I'm not a fighter...I don't argue with people for fun...PSA has quality control issues...more issues than some other grading co's...and it is and will continue to be a thorn in the side of this wonderful hobby ...that's all. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1953 Howell RC PSA 7 1961 DeJordy RC PSA 7 1965 Cheevers RC PSA 7.5 For Sale | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 01-15-2009 10:30 AM |
| FS-T207's Mullin No D PSA 6 (highest graded),McDonald PSA 6 (1 higher), Henry PSA 3 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 12-03-2007 05:30 AM |
Threaded Mode