 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37
02-26-2007, 09:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Mastronet, I may be wrong here but let's here opinions??
Posted By: Brian
I disagree that a scan is all you need. How many times have you obtained a card that had defects not obvious in a scan (I know I have)? Let's face it, it's pretty easy to hide things depending upon how you scan the card. That forces the potential buyer to ask lots of questions usually.....which could all be avoided if some of the flowery language were replaced with an unvarnished description. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mastronet Wow! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 11-24-2005 10:12 AM |
| mastronet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-06-2005 10:00 AM |
| Thank you MastroNet!!!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-19-2005 07:14 AM |
| Mastronet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2005 10:42 AM |
| MastroNet on CNN | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-17-2002 06:44 PM |
Threaded Mode