 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-23-2007, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Mastronet, I may be wrong here but let's here opinions??
Posted By: Doug Allen
I would agree if the entire lot is fair to poor. In that case go to the Cobb, Mathewson, Johnson, HOF, rarities so you can picture and describe them. My example was a lot for which 72% of the lot and 95% of the value was VG or better. In that case I don't believe it is necessary to provide detailed images or descriptions of each card. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mastronet Wow! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 11-24-2005 10:12 AM |
| mastronet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-06-2005 10:00 AM |
| Thank you MastroNet!!!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-19-2005 07:14 AM |
| Mastronet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-01-2005 10:42 AM |
| MastroNet on CNN | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-17-2002 06:44 PM |
Hybrid Mode
