MastroNet Lot Misrepresentation – Results of a Discussion with Doug Allen

[Archive]

Posted By: Dave Grimes

And what happened if the underbidder turned it down on finding out that the lot was 71 cards not the 80+ cards listed in the description- and so on down the line?

Since they listed all the cards in the description, I presume with grades, they should be able to work out a compensation number based on a close approximation of value?

Or is that just too logical - or more relevant, too profit depleting?

One would think with a 35% spread of commissions they would get it right the first time with the lot title matching the description? If not one would hope they initiate an internal review to find out how the mistake happened...or.....who might have appropriated the missing cards?