![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
It would either be a print or a transparency (positive film). And the key difference from a straight painting over the image is opacity of the material. If you paint over an image the result is more opaque than applying a thin wash of dye over a picture or transparency, which lets the underlying image show through, which is why a hand-tinted photo or transparency looks photographic. Today, of course, the whole thing is done with computer software. I still don't think it has the same quality as a hand-tinted image, though, since any hand-applied process is going to have minute differences in degree of application as the artist wields a brush or airbrush. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
Ben guessed the "1452". MW ( vaguely) guessed the "sjowall."" " | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-22-2003 06:57 PM |