![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dean H
Here is another 2 for ya. Why the 2? There is glue residue on the back that can only be seen when tilted under strong lighting. I need a new scan because this card is now in a SGC 2 holder. This card is what convinced me that I can collect lower grade cards and still be satisfied. Eye appeal can be outstanding when these beauties are discovered. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
As things evolve....your current focus on collecting pre-war? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 93 | 02-19-2009 01:11 PM |
Is the Grading System Broken? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 328 | 07-11-2007 10:09 PM |
A new grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-15-2006 12:40 PM |
It is quite easy to voice your dissatisfaction with current grading standards, | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-25-2006 11:51 AM |
What's wrong with photo cards grading standards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-29-2005 09:16 PM |