![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Are you asking me to name names on the board? Would you? I generally find all raw cards to be somewhat overgraded. I also find it to be a little worse of a transgression than puffery. When something is called rare, or I see words such as "extraordinary" or "exceptional" in a description, my eyes glaze over and I pay absolutely no attention to them. But when I see terms such as "very good" or "excellent" I feel a need to quantify that in some way. No reason why an auction house can't grade raw cards closer to the way a grading service will, since they know a great number of them are headed that way anyway. There are always aspects of the hobby that need work, and this is one of them. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grading Issue and Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-06-2008 03:52 PM |
What issue is this? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 02-03-2008 09:37 AM |
vcbc issue #6, is it worth buying a back issue... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-26-2006 10:07 AM |
Grading Issue (not who's better,...) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-15-2005 10:57 AM |
Looking for old issue | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-15-2004 07:12 AM |