![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
I agree that all of this kind of falls in the laps of the grading services. At a time when card altering was both rampant and undetected, an opening was created for the grading companies to come in and closely examine cards with equipment collectors did not have. That is why I think it is critical that they perform the most precise analysis of each card possible, and keep mistakes to an absolute minimum. My take is they could be doing a better job than they are doing now. And I disagree with Michael that the number of altered cards that slip past the graders is .1%. I must tell you, in the strongest possible terms, that you will find out sometime in the future the number of altered cards that make their way into holders is distressingly larger than that. Please don't ask me for a percentage, because it would just be speculation. But .1% couldn't even hit the broad side of a barn. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fixing scratched slabs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-04-2008 08:24 AM |
fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 05:17 PM |
The Dallas Dinner- Curing the hobby's ills | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 01-21-2007 02:36 PM |
too bad this card is so heavily trimmed... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-27-2003 06:03 PM |
Help Needed fixing links | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-09-2003 07:36 PM |