![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jim Clarke
Yes I agree, the description could have been a lot better on lot 571. Why did it go so high??? A couple of bad lines in that desription as well "there is not much gradable material" and "One could go on for hours desribing this treasure trove of material in detail"... Well go on on desribe it then so people will bid it up to 50K.... Or break it up into a couple of lots to make it easier to desribe... I got outbid at 3:24Am on a Cobb postcard lot but managed to hang on to lot 783 to start off my Cuban collection.. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
winner of the leland matchbook lot #172 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-05-2008 06:36 AM |
How'd I do? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-16-2008 02:40 PM |
Jackson 90-1 SGC 5.5 in last night's Leland auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 12-18-2006 05:20 PM |
My favorite Leland lot | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-17-2006 04:03 PM |
Leland Auctions- question for group | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 12-12-2002 11:05 PM |