 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
11-30-2006, 04:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin & Company's Stance on Hobby Issues
Posted By: cmoking
Charlie, you are dealing in semantics. The fact is that your opinion of alteration/restoration is different than PSA and SGC's opinion. This means if/when a card is altered, even on the level-one that Dave Forman described, the card alterer/submitter is basically trying to fool PSA and SGC by getting it past them. Again, you may disagree with their opinion, and you may be completely right to disagree. But the submitter is trying to fool them. That's not a good thing IMO. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Memory Lane's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 01-06-2007 08:11 PM |
| SCP Auctions(Sports Cards Plus) Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 12-01-2006 05:13 AM |
| Mile High Card Company's Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 11-30-2006 08:41 PM |
| Andy Madec Sportscards Stance on Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2006 08:58 PM |
| Clean Sweep's Stance on Larger Hobby Issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 11-29-2006 10:56 AM |
Threaded Mode