![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
I disagree. The comments here have not been unduly harsh. Moreover, the question is not what Mastro perceives to be alterations. If a seller believes that any change in condition to a card would reasonably and/or materially affect a buyer's decision to buy, he needs to disclose it. This board has certainly made it clear--many/most believe removal of a surface wrinkle is improper. Presumably, they also would want to know if such removal has taken place--I damn sure would. So Mastro does not get to define any sort of hobby standard that wrinkle removal is not an alteration as an excuse for not disclosing it (not just Mastro, but anyone). |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone else see my good bud Doug Allen on CNN* ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 12-25-2014 08:16 PM |
Doug Allen - CNBC Last Night | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-12-2008 01:27 PM |
Jay Miller and Doug Allen | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 104 | 02-29-2008 04:23 AM |
Doug Allen Did the Right Thing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 12-14-2006 02:39 PM |
Doug Allen Please Contact Me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-21-2001 01:09 PM |