![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gilbert Maines
This is precisely what I thought that you meant, however, I dismissed that understanding because I fail to see how it can be applied to the t206 situation in which the t/b natural variation has been demonstrated to be greater than an eighth of an inch. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 size variance | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-26-2007 09:40 AM |
Screwdown holder for T206 size cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-19-2006 03:47 AM |
Show Me Your Rare Type Cards From The New Poll - Minimum SGC 30 Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 11-02-2006 04:30 PM |
t206 size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 05-20-2006 03:42 PM |
Re: T206 size--ever hear of a "Jumbo"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-20-2001 02:54 PM |