Interesting email from REA

[Archive]

Posted By: Paul

I can understand for a variety of reasons (most of them legal) why REA would not want to name names. And I do appreciate how far they have already gone to publicize this problem. But I hope they go one step further and describe generically the types of problems they have seen in re-holdered cards. I would like to know, for example, if we are just talking about a dog-eared corner that has been folded back into its original position, or if we are talking about the addition of ink and other very serious alternations. Others may feel it doesn't matter - an alteration is an alteration. But I think many of us would like to know how far this has really gone.