 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-31-2006, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
PSA new label info on T-206
Posted By: warshawlaw
Of course, I can see it now; there will be a whole new tier system by people who are into PSA T206 cards, just like there is a difference in view of some towards the "old" PSA flips (with the funky zero) and the "new" flips because some people feel that the old PSA was less strict than new PSA. Will we see a price differential between flips with back data and "flops" without? Or will the perception that untrained monkeys are doing much of PSA's work flip which flip is a flop and lead to a premium on older flips (I feel like a bad Dr. Seuss)? Will the set registry now allow for differentiation and weight by backs (yep, you heard it here first)? Enquiring minds want to know. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Label on T206 Doyle.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 07-23-2008 02:41 PM |
| Authentic PSA Label on 66 Palmer? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 01-23-2008 03:07 PM |
| Looking for PSA 1,2,3 EPDG T-206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-30-2006 05:41 PM |
| Another PSA Wagner Label Error?! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-20-2006 02:52 AM |
| T-206 Pricing Info on Matty and McGraw | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-15-2006 09:04 PM |
Hybrid Mode
