 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
10-29-2006, 06:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Ethical Question #549
Posted By: Corey R. Shanus
Peter's response hits the nail on the head. The responsibilty of the seller is to provide such disclosure that a reasonably prudent buyer would want to have. In this instance I know if I was the buyer I sure as heck would want to know the card had been rejected by one of the grading services. Yes, too, the seller can accompany this disclosure with a tirade about the idiots who perhaps work for the grading service and that they simply were wrong about their assessment of the card. But the initial disclosure must be made. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this ethical??? | Archive | Hockey, Olympic, Auto Racing And All Other Cards | 3 | 03-30-2009 04:59 PM |
| T3 Turkey Red Ty Cobb PSA Authentic $749.95 ($549.95 after MSN Live Cashback) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 03-01-2009 11:06 AM |
| Hypothetical ethical issue. What would you do? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-25-2008 11:43 PM |
| Dealer ethical groups | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-26-2006 04:37 PM |
| solution to ethical problems? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-17-2005 12:38 PM |
Threaded Mode