 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-09-2006, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
ACC designations
Posted By: leon
I agree almost verbatim with Brian on the updates. I had a few conversations today, with respected members of our community, about this subject. I am all for updating the ACC and leaving the original work exactly the way it is. The Sports Collectors Bible, by Bert Sugar, is what I am thinking our work could emulate. I am researching his works now and believe that is a format I could handle and would generally be accepted. I would also like to get a thumbs up from some of the icons in the hobby, several of which I know, and several are board members. I also agree that there is no big rush on this....easy goes it.....so we'll see..... 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACC modification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-10-2007 12:15 AM |
| Need help on designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-31-2006 01:03 PM |
| Question re: "ACC Designations" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-12-2005 08:49 AM |
| T206 Willis Overprint w/Two Factory Designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2005 12:00 PM |
| What do the Factory designations on T cards actually mean? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-24-2003 10:09 PM |
Hybrid Mode
