|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: leon
The only way to keep what Burdick did, sacred, is to have some delineation of the before and after. I am opposed to adding to, or changing anything he did. But we'll see how it goes. I would agree to an R, or some letter, before every new letter/number to show the "revised" issue being spoken of....So maybe Orange Borders would be RE2, or something like that...but again, there could be a million ways to do it....I don't think I could ever be for changing, modifying, or adding to the original work....but who knows I have chnaged my mind before... |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACC modification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-10-2007 01:15 AM |
| Need help on designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-31-2006 02:03 PM |
| Question re: "ACC Designations" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-12-2005 09:49 AM |
| T206 Willis Overprint w/Two Factory Designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2005 01:00 PM |
| What do the Factory designations on T cards actually mean? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-24-2003 11:09 PM |