 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
09-24-2006, 05:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Graded Card Moral and Ethical Issue
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Cat, that card is sweet; the upper left wrinkle obviously killed the grade. But what about the E95 Plank in the Goodwin auction with paper loss on the back that managed to get a 5 from GAI? How is that paper loss so much less significant than your wrinkle? As for a BLAZER, everyone knows that he is the cousin to the bump-up known as "++++++." Every BLAZER is also a numerical grade with the added 'plus' signs next to it. I've also noticed that certain sellers only have cards that can be described with "+++++++." How lucky are they to have only such cards in their collections? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this ethical??? | Archive | Hockey, Olympic, Auto Racing And All Other Cards | 3 | 03-30-2009 04:59 PM |
| Issue with using graded card bags | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 01-23-2009 07:59 AM |
| Hypothetical ethical issue. What would you do? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-25-2008 11:43 PM |
| Moral Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 07-17-2004 01:07 PM |
| moral question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 11-26-2001 08:42 PM |
Threaded Mode