![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Yah I'm showing an example of a factory produced mark. I'm not saying this card should get the mark designation. Just showing a "marked" card that does not deserve it, as was agreed by PSA. Any card with foreign ink marks should be noted as marked. Even if the factory used an ink stamp in factory with a date it's still a mark. However if the Ink is from the actual manufacture process as shown in my example, then it is not a mark designation IMO. This also seems to be the popular consensus though I can't confirm. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stamped back T206 Jake Stahl (No Glove) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-07-2008 03:06 PM |
Victorian looking F stamped on back of t206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-11-2008 06:18 PM |
Show us your T206s with names stamped on the back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 02-05-2007 12:05 PM |
Was there a post lately regarding E cards stamped on the back... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-04-2007 06:20 PM |
Players name stamped on the back of a T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-07-2006 11:00 AM |