![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
I agree with Jim that detectable or not should not and really cannot be the test, because that leads you down a real slippery slope ending (maybe) at trimming and regraining which might be undetectable at least without an FBI investigation. It comes down, to me anyhow, to what you think is acceptable in the first place. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About soaking cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 351 | 08-06-2008 01:08 PM |
soaking an Old Judge | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-12-2008 06:06 PM |
Card Soaking | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-25-2008 06:08 PM |
Soaking question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2006 10:24 AM |
Soaking stamps | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-23-2005 11:39 AM |