|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: John S
As an instructor of Chemistry and Biology, let me educate you about the word "science". Science is a process, not a means to prove anything. Science is continually misrepresented by the media and ignorant individuals like yourself as a conclusive and fail-safe endeavor. The final step of the scientific method is the presentation of results/conclusion for criticism. While there is no doubt that had the card analyzed, a panel of experts (this board) has deemed the card a forgery. In this situation, the good scientist, if he/she was undaunted by the criticism, would re-test their hypothesis (the card is real) by eliminating variables. Bottom line, if you truly believe the card to be real, allow a panel of experts, not just hand-picked individuals, to examine the card. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Honus Wagner T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-07-2008 04:32 AM |
| How many people have a t206 honus wagner? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-10-2007 01:42 PM |
| T206 Honus Wagner-Piedmont | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 72 | 08-12-2006 04:05 AM |
| t206 honus piedmont/sweet coporal? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-07-2006 01:15 PM |
| T206 Honus Wagner owners | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-17-2006 01:02 AM |