 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
08-10-2006, 11:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
A Troubling Hobby Developement
Posted By: leon
My assumption was only more often than not, for the altered high end cards, in holders. A 50.1% is all I was actually referring to although it is in fact probably higher. It would be very interesting to take 100 PSA 8 and PSA 9 T206's and give them to an impartial expert, like Derek Grady (though his roots were at SGC I am sure he could be unbiased today) and see how many he thinks are tampered with. My guess is over 50%. Go set registry !! ....for the record I am in the camp of thinking that says taking something off of a card that was not mfg'd there is not altering. It is debatable though....regards 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-16-2007 09:10 AM |
| Troubling Auction Purchase | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 08-16-2006 02:39 PM |
| Your hobby doesn't do anything. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-17-2006 02:10 PM |
| When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-06-2005 10:17 AM |
| When it was a hobby . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-01-2005 07:15 PM |
Threaded Mode