 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
07-06-2006, 04:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Why isn't Rarity the No.1 factor in determining a card's value?
Posted By: Bob
Don't forget that some sets become "sexy" for lack of a better term. The T207s will probably never be sexy nor will the M116 Sporting Life set (both to my chagrin having completed the one and almost completed the other) but the D304s are definitely a "sexy" set as are the E107s, E92 Croft Cocoas, T210s, etc. Much desired, much lusted after, etc. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Determining Value?? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 01-19-2008 04:27 AM |
| Should Registration Factor Into the Grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 11-17-2007 12:30 PM |
| Does this card's colors look right? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-13-2006 10:07 AM |
| When is a card's condition too low? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-02-2005 09:57 AM |
| the ex-cub factor as predictor of outcome | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 10-21-2004 03:34 PM |
Threaded Mode