 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
03-13-2006, 11:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Question about 1916 M101-4 issue
Posted By: Paul
Bob Lemke has recently written an article showing that there were three print runs, not two. So the sets could be labelled M101-5A, M101-5B, and M101-4. However, the first two print runs (5A and 5B) are so similar that he is leaving them under a single designation, M101-5. The first print run (5A) includes cards of Bobby Wallace and Beals Becker, who are not in the second or third print runs. I believe Bob found a few more changes between the two print runs, but not nearly as many differences as between M101-5 and M101-4. If these differences had been noticed when the ACC was written, this group of sets probably would have been give three separate designations. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1922 e120 vs. 1916 m101-4 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-25-2008 10:09 AM |
| 1916 M101-5 Dick Rudolph | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-03-2006 05:43 PM |
| 1916 M101-4 Set on ebay | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 6 | 03-14-2006 08:37 PM |
| 1916 M101-4/5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 01-06-2005 08:06 AM |
| Need help identifying this 1916 issue. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 12-22-2002 09:42 AM |
Threaded Mode