 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-10-2006, 05:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Ty Cobb Rookie ?.....let's debate it .
Posted By: warshawlaw
If a card makes it into the Standard Catalog and was actually issued to the masses in the USA, I don't see how you can ignore it and claim it isn't the player's first MLB card. And if it is the player's first MLB card and isn't his "rookie" then what possible explanatory value does a "rookie" have? 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Continuing the Ty Cobb/Ty Cobb back debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 92 | 01-31-2009 05:50 PM |
| Let's really "re-hash" the ROOKIE debate. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 135 | 08-12-2007 11:10 PM |
| E102 Ty Cobb Rookie SGC 10 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 7 | 02-12-2007 09:36 AM |
| Rookie debate Part 2......Cobb | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 09-24-2005 08:40 PM |
| Cobb Rookie Photo on Ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-05-2004 03:05 PM |
Hybrid Mode
