One More Rip Off

[Archive]

Posted By: Jon & Jennifer

I have been checking in from time to time throughout the day in order to read up on the latest on the Jeanniegate Scandal. Every time I think, okay, this thread has just about run its course, someone else comes up with another bit of bizarre and compelling info on our Miss Jeannie.

Jeannie seems to be under the impression that except for Cat, all of the posts were made by ALL THE GUYS...

'Taint necessarily so. As the very female, "Jennifer" half of the very-married "Jon & Jennifer" (as shown in our login name), please allow me to state for the record that I would NEVER, not in a million years, even for a moment consider posting a photo of myself on one of our auction pages, within our store -- or ANYWHERE on the web for that matter. (And Jon, as my other and very male-oriented better half, certainly would not advocate, suggest, or otherwise appreciate it if I did. Oh, let's be serious -- he'd be LIVID.)

"Jeannie" in the photo is without a doubt a looker. Now, I'm not even trying to suggest that I've spent my life signing modeling contracts or posing for Penthouse -- but no one has ever kicked me out of bed or run away screaming in terror, either. (And despite the fact that I've had four, count 'em four, children, at 36 I'm still considered a youngun' by most standards, weigh exactly 100 pounds soaking wet, and even manage to get the ol' lookaroo from time to time when out and about.) All this in order to avoid having our largely male population view the opinion of THIS particular female poster as merely sour grapes from a bitter old troll (vintage wine, perhaps, but not sour grapes.)

Seriously, now, what woman in her right mind -- a married woman with children, so she claims -- would post a sexy photo of herself...and let me emphasize this point...all in order to sell....BASEBALL CARDS????? Egads.

These are my theories, in no particular order of preference:

(a) Either it's a guy using the photo in order to lure OTHER guys to the auctions (yes, sex sells, but it's particularly icky when a woman sinks to that level, and in many ways it would be better if it turned out to be a guy after all);

(b) It IS a woman, but she is using a fake photo;

(c) It is a woman, and she IS the woman in the photo.

If (c) is true, it opens up far more questions than answers:

(1) Why did she not once directly address the allegations made within the Ukranian website or the website itself?

(2) Why did she not address the lifted scan of the card? (I agree with the opinion that the staining is identical in far too many areas to not be a stolen scan).

(3) Why does she repeatedly address ALL THE GUYS in capitalized letters? (Which really does point to something interesting in and of itself, but I can't quite put my finger on what.)

(4) She claimed that she was already aware that her photo had been stolen and used by nefarious persons many times in the past...if that were the case, then WHY in the world would you even consider putting your photo on the internet -- especially the very same photo that you say you "already know" was stolen and used by persons other than yourself in the past???

(4) This was said earlier, but truly bears repeating --- exactly what kind of moron tries to suggest that a sexy photo was intentionally posted on the internet...simply to AVOID sexual repartee and personal questions?? (Snicker, snicker)

Another, slightly more sinister theory that hasn't been offered as of yet, is that Jeannie IS the Jeannie in the photo, and the Jeannie of Jeannie's cards...but is ALSO the "Olga" of the Ukranian website. I know, I know...but you never know...