 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29
12-22-2005, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
one grading company says Trimmed, another says not
Posted By: FYS
My understanding is that PSA uses trim rejections somewhat arbitrarily to increase revenues. It is assumed that a majority of the cards will be resubmitted, which drives up profits. Same reason for some of the inconsistent grading. Grade some low and you know there will be some resubmittals. Absolute brilliance! Public companies with large market share and a religious following can afford and must take part in questionable activities to improve share price. PSA clones, please put your guns away and understand that I am trying to add humour to this always serious debate. Happy Holidays and enjoy the cardboard! 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which grading company is the best? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-11-2004 06:15 PM |
| New grading company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-18-2004 01:52 AM |
| What the! ANOTHER Grading company??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-29-2003 01:35 AM |
| and...another Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 10-05-2002 11:33 AM |
| VonDole~Mosser and company w/trimmed PRO cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-20-2002 02:48 PM |
Threaded Mode