|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: warshawlaw
I once heard (I think it was on Star Trek) that the simplest explanation, all other things being equal, is usually the right one. Leaf used 49-card sheets to print its cards. The cards were then cut, collated and packed. The collation is the point where randomness failed. The cards were not perfectly collated. I purchased a large Leaf boxing collection from the original owner and had a similar experience: as many as a dozen of certain cards and none of some others. It isn't short prints or mathematical models of randomness, it is lousy collation. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1949 Leaf Paige | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-27-2008 03:50 AM |
| Trying to post under 1949 leaf? I am done with PSA | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 19 | 11-22-2007 05:37 AM |
| What's the Best Magazine, Periodical, or Blog for Post War Vintage? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-17-2007 02:07 PM |
| What's Best Place in Dallas, TX for Post War Vintage? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 10-13-2007 07:14 AM |
| 1949 Leaf Paige on Ebay - Real or Reprint ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-22-2005 07:41 AM |