![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Corey R. Shanus
If there are objective criteria for corner wear and creases, why can't there be the same for photo contrast and resolution? I simply don't agree with the view that evaluating corner wear and creases is an objective evaluation but evaluating photo contrast and resolution is unnecessarily subjective. It seems to me that in the end, the grade for the card should reflect some reasonable determination of how a knowledgable collector would rate the card. If I owned a grading company, I would announce my grading criteria and objectives and let the market decide how much they agree with my factors and my weighting of each. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any idea what this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 01-21-2009 05:52 AM |
Any idea what this is? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 08-20-2008 06:10 PM |
Any Idea What Happened to.............. | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 10-16-2007 11:42 AM |
Any idea on how to | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-06-2004 05:52 AM |
Cool idea....but | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-21-2003 12:55 PM |