|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: david
if that is the case then sgc is completely useless as an objective third party. you can not selectively apply the grading guidelines. case in point two years ago REA auctioned off a G and B which had dirt erased around the portrait and as a result would not grade by sgc. how is that different then this case? the point of erasing errant marks it to visually enhance the card and by proxy increase the grade. according the third party guidelines this is unacceptable. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How do you guys feel about... | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 08-17-2007 04:22 PM |
| Is it just me or does anyone else feel overwhelmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-26-2005 01:09 PM |
| Please make me feel better | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 05-19-2005 06:50 PM |
| Well If I Ever Feel the Need to Own the Best.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 04-14-2005 07:12 AM |
| Do you feel like we do..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-11-2003 09:16 PM |