 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
10-25-2005, 11:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Sets vs. Singles
Posted By: Geoff Litwack
I was going to post a similar topic. I'm a set collector - I built and sold 1965 Topps, then 1955 and 1954 Bowman. After that I did the Diamond Stars and 1941 Play Ball, which I kept, and now I'm working on '33 World Wide Gum and T207. Of late I've been thinking about changing up and becoming an HOF collector - it's sort of frustrating to me to have capital locked up in commons, many of which I don't really care about. Argh! 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OPC sets/singles 1975-1988 baseball | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 09:08 PM |
| OPC singles/sets 70s-80s (baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-16-2008 09:15 AM |
| OPC baseball 1975-1988 sets/singles | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-12-2008 05:29 AM |
| 1970-1980 singles/Sets FS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-13-2008 09:06 AM |
| hypothetical question: sets vs singles in an auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-27-2005 05:32 AM |
Threaded Mode