 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
10-25-2005, 07:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Sets vs. Singles
Posted By: Chad
As a teenager, I managed to put together a Topps redbacks set and, now that I'm older, I still work on those kind of sets--small and relatively affordable. I'm one card away from completeing my Remar 1949 Oaks set and I've been plugging away on a few others. I bought a lot of W512's on the cheap and so I'll probably work on that set, too. I'm not going to impress anybody with these sets, but they're fun and it's not hopeless for me to try. I also buy cards from sets I'll never even get close to completing--T206 etc., just because I like the cards. I also make up my own "sets" to collect, like all the catchers from the T206 set, or, and this is my main focus, cards of Negro Leaguers. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OPC sets/singles 1975-1988 baseball | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 09:08 PM |
| OPC singles/sets 70s-80s (baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-16-2008 09:15 AM |
| OPC baseball 1975-1988 sets/singles | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-12-2008 05:29 AM |
| 1970-1980 singles/Sets FS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-13-2008 09:06 AM |
| hypothetical question: sets vs singles in an auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-27-2005 05:32 AM |
Threaded Mode