 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30
09-30-2005, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
2006 Standard Catalog Index Error
Posted By: Geno
If we must have the post-1980 junk in there, then it should be just the stars, with the commons priced as a group. If you really need to collect the 1992 Topps set, do we really care that Mel Hall, Otis Nixon, and Dan Plesac (as well as 800 other dudes) all "book" for a nickel? Just say "Commons - .05" even though we all know they are worthless. I don't agree with the suggestions to get rid of team-issued postcards, etc. They may not be cards, but I'd rather have a 1975 Denny Doyle Angels Postcard than a complete 1990 Topps set. By the way, does anyone have a 1975 Denny Doyle Angels postcard (really, I need one!)?? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looking 4, 2006 Standard Catalog Of Baseball Cards | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-02-2006 08:13 PM |
| Vintage Index (pre 1920) for 2006 Standard Catalog of Baseball Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-19-2006 05:53 AM |
| ? for those with 2006 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-29-2005 05:34 PM |
| 2006 Standard Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-30-2005 12:43 PM |
| Apparent dating error in R328 Standard Catalog listing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 09-01-2005 02:26 PM |
Threaded Mode