![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I concur that the card was probably graded b/c the pencil writing was considered a marking rather than an alteration - from the sound of it, the pencil writing was obvious and not intended to decieve and that distinguishes it from an altered card in my mind. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Card restored......... Wow ! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 05-23-2006 07:15 AM |
Why would SGC not grade this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 08-13-2005 03:37 PM |
Card HOF thought | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-26-2002 08:10 PM |
Restored high$$ cards in slabbed-holders, especially PSA, SGC and ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 08-30-2002 10:16 AM |
Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-08-2002 11:20 AM |