 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
08-02-2005, 02:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Why would SGC not grade this card?
Posted By: davidcycleback
The answer to the earlier questions is that lithographic ink doesn't disolve in water. Only certain toxic liquids disolve lithograhic ink, none of which come out of your water tap. Though if you soak a card long enough, perhaps the paper stock itself might loosen taking some ink with it. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SOLD - High-Grade 1909 Ramly (T204) - Tim Murnane HOF Rookie Card (SGC 60) | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-30-2008 05:21 PM |
| High Grade Sale '64 SGC 84 Yaz; '68 SGC 86 Seaver; '57 SGC 80 Yanks; '67 SGC 84 BrockFlood | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-23-2007 09:05 AM |
| I thought SGC didn't grade restored card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 09-28-2005 12:32 AM |
| Will SGC grade an E103 Williams Caramel card if | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-31-2004 02:16 PM |
| Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-08-2002 11:20 AM |
Threaded Mode