![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Colt McClelland
How is it known that the blank back E104's are in fact Nadja's? It seems logical that they could have been either an "anonymous" set similar to E98's or perhaps just as easily a blank back version of D359 or T208. Anyone know the history on this? |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calling All W517 Experts... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 09-29-2012 12:41 PM |
Calling On T207 Experts for Help! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-01-2008 06:39 PM |
OT: Calling All Autograph Experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-11-2006 09:05 PM |
Calling W517 Experts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-29-2005 08:06 PM |
Calling all Exhibit experts... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-09-2005 04:29 PM |